Al-Ghazali Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Al-Ghazali - Essay ExampleHe wrote many newss on a wide range of topics which included jurisprudence, theology, mysticism and philosophy. One of his biggest achievements was to change the course of Islamic philosophy by successfully refuting the early Islamic Neo-Platonism. Al-Ghazil studied philosophy intensely and was aware of its theoretical attraction and its morphologic forte. It is considered that he was indirectly charmd by philosophy even though he fought sharply against philosophy and tried and true to highlight its contradiction. (Campanini, 2007) Al-Ghazils father treasured the companionship of jurists and Sufi and wished to have children who would pursue this way of life. His consume took place in the village of Tabaran nearby Tus in northeast Iran and came from an unassertive family. When he was still in his childhood his father expired and left pint-sized cash in the custody of his Sufi friend. When the money given by his father ran out, he joined a Madrasah which allowed him to get a wage plus room and board. Later on in his life, Al-Ghazali travelled Nisahapur and studied with the famous scholar of that cadence Al-Juwayni at the college of Nizamyah. Al-Ghazali was one of his most well-known pupils and Al-Juwayni used to call him an ocean of knowledge. After the demise of his wise man he then journeyed to the camp of Seljuk wazir Nizam al-Mulk which was the meeting place of intellectuals. His distinction was noted swiftly in such a well-known gathering and that is why Nizam al-Mulk selected him as an instructor in the famous Nizamyah college of Baghdad. (Hozien 2001) In 1095 A.D. Al-Ghazali wrote a book called Tahafah al-Falasifah Incoherence of the Philosophers in which he attacked the Greek-inspired philosophers. In this book Al-Ghazali judged the beliefs of these philosophers to be opposing to the teachings contained in the Quran and said that they were spreading falsehood. He stated that the philosophers teaching were having a bad def ine on Islamic thoughts and faith. No one at that time could give a convincing blood line against Al-Ghazali (Bergh, 1954) After around eighty years ibn Rushud responded to Al-Ghazalis attack by publishing a book called Tahafah al-Tahafah (The Incoherence of the Incoherence), where he alternately cited Ghazalis views and his own. One of the topic in which these two intellects debated was serve and nitty-gritty. Al-Ghazali explained that the necessary existence between cause and effect does not validate that the same effect would buzz off place of a specific cause. He specifically focused on the relationship between blow and burning, mentioning that the former only happens because Allah as an agent led it to be. He dismissed the belief that the cause and its effect takes place naturally but happens because of the willingness of Allah. Al-Ghazali referred to the account of Abraham in Quran who was preternaturally protected from the harm of sex. Al-Ghazali impeach the theorists of keeping a view against Islam because he explained that the philosophers rejected the possibility that Abraham could be unharmed by fire as long as it kept its characteristic of burning. Ibn Rushud refuted this allegation by clarifying that if an object does not have a precise characteristic, then the object would lose its distinct term and meaning. He boost explained that the disowning of cause and effect would result in the rejection of a persons own assertion. Ibn Rushud wrote in his book that ifmotive is impermissible to realize, then there is an obvious association between two deliver the goods actions. Hence it would not be able to function according to its function and will lose the influence of making obvious thoughts and would not have the chance of